Compare WebP, AVIF, and the original image in three side-by-side panels

Page Summary

The WebP/AVIF Compression Comparison tool is a free browser-based utility that displays a single image in three formats — original, WebP, and AVIF — at the same time, letting you compare file sizes and reduction rates in real time. Adjust each format's quality slider to visually balance image quality against file size and find your optimal settings. Use it to speed up your website and improve image optimization.

  • Formats compared: Original (JPG/PNG) / WebP / AVIF
  • Quality control: Independent sliders for WebP and AVIF
  • Real-time updates: Instant comparison as you move the sliders
  • Privacy: Images are never uploaded or stored on a server
ADVERTISEMENT

WebP / AVIF Compression Comparison

How to Use

1
Upload an image
Drop a JPG or PNG image, or click to select
2
Adjust quality and compare
Tune the WebP and AVIF sliders to see how size changes
3
Download the best format
Pick the format that suits your use case and download

🔒 Images are processed in your browser and are never uploaded or stored on a server.

Click or drag & drop to upload an image

JPG, PNG supported
Original file:
ADVERTISEMENT

Frequently Asked Questions

What are WebP and AVIF? Features of Next-Generation Image Formats

WebP, developed by Google, reduces file size by roughly 25–35% compared to JPG at the same quality. It is supported by all major browsers and has become a de facto standard for web images. AVIF is a newer still-image format based on the AV1 video codec; it offers even higher compression than WebP and supports HDR and 10-bit color depth.

The Importance of Web Performance and Image Optimization

Image file size directly affects page load speed and influences your SEO score and Core Web Vitals. Migrating to next-generation formats is an effective way to improve user experience and search rankings. Use this tool to measure the actual savings while you find the best format and quality settings.

Practical Limitations and What You Can't Do

In-browser image format conversion through the Canvas API depends on the browser's native encoder. AVIF encoding is only available in Chromium-based browsers; it isn't supported on Safari or Firefox. You also can't fine-tune low-level encoder parameters such as keyframe interval, tiling, or compression speed. For specialized parameter tuning, consider CLI tools like libavif or libwebp.

Drawbacks and Trade-offs

Next-generation formats (WebP/AVIF) are highly efficient, but there are trade-offs against support coverage. WebP browser support is now above 95%, but some image editors (older Photoshop versions, for example) can't open WebP files directly. AVIF is even more efficient but slower to encode and isn't fully supported across browsers. Use this tool to compare actual file sizes and visual quality, and pick the format that best fits your use case.

Real-World Q&A

Q: Should I use WebP or AVIF? — Pick WebP for compatibility, AVIF for maximum compression. The best practice is to set up an AVIF → WebP → JPEG fallback chain in the HTML picture element. Q: My file sizes differ a lot between formats at the same quality setting — Each format defines "quality" on a different scale. JPEG quality 80% and WebP quality 80% are not the same visual quality. Visual comparison is what matters.

Image Format Trends

Image formats keep evolving: JPEG (1992) → PNG (1996) → WebP (2010) → AVIF (2019) → JPEG XL (2021). According to HTTP Archive data, WebP adoption surpassed 30% of all web images in 2024, and AVIF is growing rapidly. Because Google's Core Web Vitals tie LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) directly to image format choice, format comparison matters more than ever from an SEO perspective.